An Executive Summary of the draft EC was also made available on the website to provide a high-level overview of the document and summary of the more substantial changes since the original 1984 ER. USACE requested assistance in the form of data, comments, literature references, or field experiences, to help clarify the policy requirements for implementing EO 11988 and EO 13690 for agency activities. A draft EC was made available for review. A fact sheet was also released to provide additional information and details. A notice was placed in the Federal Register to announce the availability of the draft Engineer Circular (EC). USACE sought feedback from partners, other government and non-government stakeholders, Tribes, and members of the general public on the proposed draft guidance that has been developed. This extension was offered in response to several requests as well as in recognition of the difficulty in compiling comments over the holiday season, the level of complexity and uncertainty around some of the changes in process being considered, and uncertainty due to the recent change in Administration. USACE extended the deadline for public comments on the draft EC for implementing EO 11988 from 30 January 2017 to. Approximately 250 comments were received, which were reviewed for the purpose of considering revisions to the draft EC prior to finalizing and implementing the document. The comment period on the draft Engineering Circular (EC) for implementing EO 11988 (now revoked) closed on May 1, 2017. Both the NACCS and the FFRMS aimed to reduce risk and increase resilience of communities’ abilities to withstand and rapidly recover from storm damages in addition to encouraging the use of natural systems, ecosystem processes, and nature-based approaches. This is consistent with recommendations and findings in the North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study (NACCS). Once implemented, the FFRMS was to assist in reducing the risk and cost of future flood disasters by ensuring that Federal investments in and affecting floodplains are constructed to better withstand the impacts of flooding.ĮO 13690 also encouraged agencies to consider natural systems, ecosystem processes, and nature-based approaches when development alternatives are considered. The EO amended existing EO 11988: Floodplain Management, originally issued in 1977, to include a Federal Flood Risk Management Standard (FFRMS). EO 11988 governs federal actions in floodplains and includes an eight-step decision making process aimed to encourage wise floodplain management decisions. On January 30, 2015, the President issued Executive Order (EO) 13690 (pdf, 1.0 MB): Establishing of a Federal Flood Risk Management Standard and a Process for Further Soliciting and Considering Stakeholder Input (subsequently revoked). Army Corps of Engineers intended to implement the new requirements, explore the sections below. To learn more about the FFRMS and how the U.S. The Federal Flood Risk Management Standard (FFRMS) was issued January 2015 to encourage federal agencies to consider current and future risk when taxpayer dollars are used to build or rebuild near floodplains. There will be no further development or any implementation of the draft Engineer Circular which had been prepared to implement EO 13690 and that was shared for public comment in December 2016. This existing USACE guidance for EO 11988 applies to planning, design, and construction of Civil Works projects, operations and maintenance activities, and real estate program activities. As such, USACE will continue to implement EO 11988 according to USACE Engineering Regulation (ER). EO 13807 did not revoke or otherwise alter EO 11988. Executive Order (EO) 13690, which established the Federal Flood Risk Management Standard, was revoked by Section 6 of EO 13807, Establishing Discipline and Accountability in the Environmental Review and Permitting Process for Infrastructure.

Executive order 13690 fema region x